Evaluating the process and impact of active dissemination of an e-thesis: a new authorial model

Content

Evaluating the process and impact of active dissemination of an e-thesis: a new authorial model

Metadata

Title

Evaluating the process and impact of active dissemination of an e-thesis: a new authorial model

Description

Objective: To present a new model of e-thesis publication and dissemination from an author's perspective. Methods: The recent publication and active dissemination of a nursing PhD thesis via an Institutional Repository has been evaluated through an integrated research study which focused on the product, key processes and impacts. A reflexive, evaluative case study approach was taken, drawing on Stake (1995)'s ideas of the intrinsic interest of a particular case and its instrumental value in highlighting more general issues. Formative research processes included documentary recording of key meetings, activities and decisions. Summative research processes included collation and analysis of data indicating the nature and extent of reader engagement. Results: The study suggests the relevance of a new four stage model of the initial ETD authorial experience: conceptualisation/re-conceptualisation; preparation; dissemination; and evaluation. The paper will describe the key processes that were found to characterise each stage, and will identify related impacts. Conceptualisation of the thesis as a live electronic entity emerged as essential, and authorial motivation was seen as a key component within this. Linking the author's academic home web page to the IR thesis web page provided contextual "framing" and emerged as an important part of the preparation process. A specific dissemination strategy targeting key policy and professional practice e mail contacts was taken forward along with more generalised web based initiatives. Evaluation highlighted strengths and weaknesses of the approach taken. Conclusions: The value of thinking through an initial publication and dissemination strategy and incorporating ongoing research is strongly suggested. The new four stage authorial model offers a way of realising this that may have potential value for many disciplines. Reference: Stake, R (1995) The art of case study research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Date

2008